In this ‘MeToo’ Catholic Church sex scandal, and now ‘Surviving R Kelly’ era it might be surprising to find that even currently, even after the Weinstein sex-abuse scandal busted Hollyweird wide open, there are so-called ‘victim advocates’ who are aiding and abetting abuse of the innocent, sexual or otherwise, even perhaps unintentionally. Sounds extreme, right? But it’s true. What if teaching about LGBT in schools is not really about teaching ‘tolerance’, but priming the well for those students to be exposed to sexualization under the guise of ‘education’. It’s not, it’s merely indoctrination, and for the sinister, about pedophilia. Yes, there is actually a LGBTP (P for pedophile) movement. NAMBLA would be so proud.
I’m not talking about the average gay person who just wants to live their life, either. As a conservative, I believe in people being able to do what they want so long as it doesn’t affect me negatively. And though I personally don’t believe in gay ‘marriage’, but am with civil unions, if people want to have relationships of the same sex, as long as they don’t try to either force it down my throat, or try to change the way I live my life or what I believe, I don’t really care. Even a dude who wants to dress up as a chick, though I think it’s weird and probably a mental disorder, I don’t really care. But what’s happened is the ‘fight for equality’ that was the mantra of the original gay rights movement has been hijacked to include bisexuals and transgenders, and currently, pedophiles, albeit less exuberantly. Gays ought to be horrified, after all, the argument has always been that ‘it’s not about sex, it’s about who I am’. Well, if being gay is not about ‘sex’, then why on earth would you include bisexualism? Also, the average gay person knows what gender they are, why would they allow themselves to be lumped in with those with mental disorders?
A recent photo of a ‘drag kid’, in this case a boy dressed as a girl, pictured with a naked adult drag queen (man who dresses as a woman), has caused outrage, rightfully so, and brings into stark relief just how insidious the modern ‘tolerance’ movement of ‘transgender’ people is. The child, Young Nemis, age 8, whose drag name is “Queen Lactacia,”…in full drag makeup and a black dress, is posing for a photo with the Season 7 winner of “RuPaul’s Drag Race,” Violet Chachki. In the shocking photo, Violet is wearing nothing but a pair of heels and a small piece of fabric covering his genitals’, And at quick glance, it almost looks like the adult is touching the child on their behind in a sexual way, while the child looking coquettishly at the camera. Though the adult Chachki claims the story the picture was taken for was actually against sexualization of children, how could it be anything but?
Another drag kid Desmond, aka Desmond the Amazing, age 10, was fetted on Good Morning America as if being a boy who dresses up like a flamboyant vaudeville performing female is just the greatest things since sliced bread. And as found in a video on YouTube, he was not only permitted to do a coy ‘dance’ ala stripping at a gay bar, getting dollar bills thrown at him by older gay men, but there’s also a video of him with Michael Alig, a former drag ‘club kid’ who was in prison for murdering a club kid friend of his (Alig is claimed to have injected Drano into his roommate’s veins), acting as always, very exaggerated and flamboyant. They were talking about drag stuff, with Desmond in extreme makeup and looking kind of high actually, and not insignificantly, a painting behind him with a child jumping rope and the word rohypnol on it. Rohypnol is the date rape drug commonly known as roofie.
In another video, Desmond is with a different drag queen who mentions ‘doing ketamine on a couch’ (from the movie Party Monster, based on the life story of Alig, who, by the way, was sexually molested as a boy by his Sunday school teacher, apparently with his mother’s knowledge, according to the movie). In this video, Desmond simulates snorting ketamine. So a few questions – WHERE.ARE.THE.PARENTS? Where is Child Protective Services? Why is Alig, a convicted murderer, being rehabbed by the likes of Vogue magazine and gay pride parades? And why is that kids mother letting him hang out with him? Is ‘drag kid’-ing your child the new Munchausen?
It all started with gay marriage. Long before the SCOTUS ruled to legalize it, there was curricula written by gay activists, ready for immediate implementation should such a ruling ever come down, which of course they’ve been working on for years, to make sure your 5 year old is forced to read ‘My Two Dads’ and ‘When Susie Met Sally’. Sure, for some it was actually about ‘marriage’ and the legal fruits thereof – legal partnerships hospital visits, estate planning, etc. I do think that if you love and live with someone and you want to plan your life and financial affairs with them, or be able to see them in the hospital and make decisions about their care, you should have that right.
But for the activists, it wasn’t about that. It was about not only normalizing homosexuality, but degrading and dismantling the Judeo-Christian foundation of the nation, for the two can’t coexist if the Bible tells you that to lay down with a member of your own sex is an abomination. Now whether the goal of those particular activists was to normalize pedophilia I can’t say, but Lenin certainly knew that you could always manipulate the ‘useful idiots’ to further your goal if you presented it right. You can call me a conspiracy theorist or a bigot or a homophobe, or all of the above, I don’t really care. I care about the safety of children, and none of this ensures the safety of children.
In 2011, Researchers from several prominent U.S. universities participated in a Baltimore conference aimed at normalizing pedophilia. According to the sponsoring organization’s website, the event was to:
‘examine ways in which “minor-attracted persons” can be involved in a revision of the American Psychological Association (APA) classification of pedophilia….B4U-ACT, a group of pro-pedophile activists and mental health professionals, was behind the conference, On their website B4U-ACT classifies pedophilia as simply another sexual orientation and decries the “stigma” attached to pedophilia, observing: “No one chooses to be emotionally and sexually attracted to children or adolescents. The cause is unknown; in fact, the development of attraction to adults is not understood.” The group says that it does not advocate treatment to change feelings of attraction to children or adolescents’.
According to Liberty University Visiting Professor of Law Judith Reisman, an expert on sexual ethics and pornography who criticized the conference, “This has been on the agenda for decades…Other conference academicians, some hired by pornographers, presented ‘scientific’ papers advocating the legalization of child pornography, prostitution and an end to age of consent,” she said. “They promoted their ‘scientific’ claims for early childhood sexuality to lawmakers and fellow academicians via both legitimate and pornographic media.
“The DSM is typical of this degeneracy since they already had lightened the diagnosis of pedophilia as to make it almost meaningless, requiring that the pedophile be ‘bothered’ by his and her abuse of children and so on,” Reisman said. “We now have women and children sexually violating children as well as men. This will continue to spiral down into, well, we’d have to say the abyss of hell, unless we retrieve our laws, our mass media and our schools.”
‘As previously reported by LSN, (with which Riesman is affiliated) similar lobbying, then by homosexual activists, led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder in 1973 in the DSM. As a result of the DSM declassification, debate regarding homosexuality and the many documented harms associated with the homosexual lifestyle has been all but shut down in academic psychological circles.’
Add to all of this insanity the jokes Hollyweird freaks make about molesting children (and no, I’m not kidding), and you have to wonder wtf is wrong with these people? There’s a video ‘skit’ of Sarah Silverman and Patton Oswalt talking about ‘thoughts about children’, joking about kidnapping children in their vans, with Oswalt applying the term ‘butterface’ to a child that walks by where he was seemingly stalking them to prey on them – adult talk applied to the attraction toward children. In the first part of that video, Silverman saying to one of the boys in the van who said he had to pee pee ‘why don’t you just go in my mouth?’ And she’s Tweeted ‘Hey, is it considered molestation if the child makes the first move? I’m gonna need a quick answer on this’ and ‘I changed a baby’s diaper today and she had a totally shaved vagina. What a country!’ Thankfully Jake Tapper offered a rare moment of sanity from him and replied ‘Preying on children is the definition of evil. Justifying it in any way is sick and disturbing…Has everyone lost their minds?’ You have to wonder what the thinking was that would either inspire anyone to make such a video in the first place, but in the second, to think that anyone would think it’s ok!
‘Actress’ Lena Dunham describes molesting her sister in a ‘book’ she wrote, (I won’t get into the disgusting details). Director Jamie Gunn had some truly horrific Tweets about rape and pedophilia, which he dismissed as part of him being a ‘provocateur’, but any normal parent would be thinking about loading the shotgun at reading them. Thankfully Disney fired him, but only after the Tweets had been out there a while. Corey Feldman has talked about pedophilia in Hollyweird for years, but it wasn’t something that was joked about in the open like this!
It’s not just here either, back in the day, famous British media personality Jimmy Savile was apparently raping children and everyone knew, and other famous Brits were caught up in the investigation as well. And there’s the issue of Bacha Bazi in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the (Muslim) men, who dress their women up in tarps and only screw them to reproduce, have sex with little boys dressed up as ‘dancing girls’. A U.S. Green Beret was almost kicked out of the Army for beating an Afghan officer whom he found raping a screaming boy – on an American base!!! ‘It’s their culture’ it was explained – and yes, this actually happened! Wiser heads prevailed after swift outrage ensued and the Green Beret wasn’t dismissed, but why was it even a consideration? And what do you think it did to those young soldiers who were forced to listen to the screaming every night?
Yes, we are on the precipice, actually have been for a while, of a very slippery slope with this stuff, and the community who fought so hard to have their right to live freely but had their movement hijacked should be the loudest ones against this depravity which has become associated with their cause, but they are not. And it shouldn’t necessarily be their responsibility, except that the pedos are adding the P to the LGBT movement acronym. The bottom line is that it is about pedophilia writ large and it needs to be stopped, not accepted under some insane banner of ‘love is love’ and ‘love has no age’, which is the pedo screed. I mean seriously, if there is anything that should be ‘stigmatized’, it’s pedophilia, right? It should be denounced, obviously, and not normalized, in and of itself. But we have other serious problems our children are facing already, that they certainly don’t need society to say it’s ok to prey on them in this way. It seems we’ve lost all sense of innocence and morality in the culture, and we need to claim it back. I mean, it’s getting Biblical. Even if you don’t believe in the Bible, you can’t deny that the words about Sodom and Gomorrah apply today. God help us if we allow this insanity to abide.